Q. Nicola Sturgeon resigns from Scotland's First Minister?

Nicola Sturgeon resigns from Scotland's First Minister?

pic562-1024x577 (1)

Nicola Sturgeon resigns from Scotland’s First Minister
Scotland’s first female leader resigns, acknowledging “unsuccessful” separation from Britain

Foreign news agencies reported from London. United เกม ยิน ปลา Kingdom on February 15 that Mrs. Nicola Sturgeon announced on Wednesday. resigned as Scotland’s First Minister, she said. “The time has come,” after a decade-long but unsuccessful attempt to push for Scottish independence.

Meanwhile, Sturgeon, 52, who also serves as leader of the Scottish Nationalist Party (SNP), spoke of “political exhaustion and division” and that she wanted to step away from “The brutality of modern politics” to give yourself more time.

Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon waved to reporters. After announcing his resignation

However, leaving Sturgeon’s position First female head of government in Scotland’s history will be officially effective When the SNP, Scotland’s ruling party, Polls can be held internally to find a new party leader. That will surely go up to the position of the new first minister by default

However, it has been analyzed that Sturgeon’s resignation “Suddenly” means that she didn’t pose “Political heir” or successor of power clearly and may lead to chaotic internal competition

The central government in London praised Sturgeon. She described it as a “terrible female politician” but called for whoever succeeded her “Please give up your obsession with independence. because it will only cause division.”

Over the course of his tenure as Scotland’s First Minister, Sturgeon has met with four Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom, including Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss. and Mr Richie Sunak, the current leader.


0

Answers

1

View

16

Feb, 2023

Asked in Category

History

Do you agree that 'History repeats itself'? If so, would you dare to face famine, war, or black death in the present version 2.0? Institutions have taught you that you must study history in order to 1.) know the origin of a place or thing, 2.) have facts in almost everything, 3.) have a glimpse of the past, or 4.) have an insight of the future. Anything else?
Is 'History repeats itself' an equivalent of predestination - trying to make things better but still, 'History repeats itself'? Reconsider that future cannot be determined by the past rather the choices made in the present. Sometimes, it's 'Past is past'.

  • 1 view overall.
  • Asked on